For lenders financing AI infrastructure
Scale AI infrastructure lending without scaling technical headcount.
Doku gives every AI infrastructure transaction, from data centers to GPU clusters, a decision-ready technical record: verified evidence, material exceptions, closing conditions, acceptance criteria, and human sign-off.
Built for private credit, specialty lenders, equipment finance, and project-finance teams.
Human judgment. Evidence-linked conclusions. Full audit trail. No black-box approvals.
AI Campus – Phase 1Ready for sign-off
Illustrative Lender A•$250M term loan
- Updated
- 2h ago
Sanitized illustrative data
Exception summary
| Issue | Category | Risk | Owner | Due |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cooling redundancy gapN+1 requirement not met for CRAH units | Cooling & heat rejection | High | Reviewer | Due today |
| Interconnection study incompleteRequired load-step evidence is missing | Site & interconnection | Medium | Operator | Due tomorrow |
| GPU acceptance criteria undefinedCommissioning threshold is not documented | GPU & network architecture | Medium | Lender | Before draw |
Evidence coverage
- Power & utility98%
- Cooling & heat rejection91%
- GPU & network architecture88%
- Site & interconnection95%
- Construction & commissioning85%
- Operations & service levels90%
Overall92%
Deliverables
- ✓Technical findings
- ✓Conditions and covenants
- ✓Acceptance tests
- ✓Draw requirements
- ✓Review memo
- ✓API response
Review timeline
- Materials receivedMay 18, 2026
- Evidence checks completeMay 19, 2026
- Exceptions assignedMay 19, 2026
- Ready for sign-offMay 20, 2026
The capacity bottleneck
Technical diligence should not cap lending volume.
Deal teams do not need more fragmented reports. They need a repeatable technical workflow that handles a larger review queue without weakening engineering judgment, lender authority, or traceability.
ONE QUEUE
Every authorized review in one controlled workflow.
LIVE REVIEW STATE
Current status from evidence intake through sign-off.
TRACEABLE CONCLUSIONS
Every material finding linked to supporting evidence.
HUMAN SIGN-OFF
Reviewers retain authority over materiality and approval.
EXPANDED CAPACITY
Standardized diligence lets the existing team handle more volume.
Decision-ready output
A technical record your credit committee can act on.
Every review resolves into lender-ready artifacts, not a loose collection of files, comments, and spreadsheets.
View sample outputSanitized illustrative output
Ready for sign-offAI Campus – Phase 1
Technical review record · version 2
- 01
Evidence register
E-014 · Utility interconnection study · verified 28 Aug
- 02
Technical findings
Cooling design supportable subject to N+1 closure evidence.
- 03
Material exceptions
M2 · GPU acceptance threshold undefined · owner: operator
- 04
Closing conditions and covenants
C-03 · Deliver integrated load-step test before initial draw.
- 05
Acceptance and commissioning tests
AT-07 · 72-hour integrated systems test · threshold pending
- 06
Draw requirements
DR-02 · Commissioning certificate and resolved punch list
Record utilities
Reviewer sign-off
Named principal reviewer · signature pending
Review memo
Credit-committee summary · version 2
API response
GET /api/v1/reviews/{review_id} · 200 OK
Live review pipeline
See every review, exception, and next step in one view.
Know what is complete, what could change the credit decision, and what is ready for sign-off across the authorized portfolio.
- ✓Authorized review state
- ✓Evidence and review progress
- ✓Material exceptions and accountable owners
- ✓Next required action and deliverables
Sanitized illustrative portfolio data
| Project | Lender | Review stage | Evidence / review progress | Material exceptions | Next required action | Last updated |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI Campus – Phase 1 | Lender A | Technical review | 92% | 2 | Sign-off | 2h ago |
| DC Expansion – Site A | Lender B | Evidence collection | 46% | 6 | Info request | 5h ago |
| GPU Cluster – TX | Lender C | Ready for sign-off | 92% | 0 | Sign-off | 1h ago |
| Edge Campus – OH | Lender D | Technical review | 78% | 1 | Reviewer | 3h ago |
| Data Center – VA | Lender E | Evidence collection | 32% | 5 | Info request | 6h ago |
Across the deal lifecycle
One technical record from underwriting through portfolio oversight.
Underwriting
Bring a current technical opinion into the credit memo.
Acceptance and draws
Tie milestones and conditions to release authority.
Covenant monitoring
Track performance against agreed thresholds when separately scoped.
Portfolio oversight
Use standardized data for portfolio risk and reporting.
Review controls
Built for lender scrutiny.
Clear boundaries, named responsibility, and decision-linked evidence keep the workflow credible from first review through sign-off.
No. Doku standardizes evidence, review state, exceptions, and outputs. Material conclusions and final sign-off remain with an authorized human reviewer.
Transaction-specific scopes can cover data centers, GPU clusters, power and cooling systems, network architecture, construction, commissioning, and operating service levels.
A completed scope can include an evidence register, technical findings, material exceptions, conditions and covenants, acceptance tests, draw requirements, a review memo, and signed technical conclusions.
Yes. The lender retains its credit decision, conditions, waivers, draw authority, and approval process. Doku provides the technical record and reviewer conclusion within the agreed scope.
Yes. Authorized partners can initiate reviews, follow normalized status, and retrieve permitted outputs through the partner API or platform.
Illustrative review
See what a lender-ready technical review looks like.
Run an illustrative review, inspect the output, and evaluate how Doku fits your underwriting workflow.